THE MCJ

Christian scholarship is the Church’s prodigious invention to defend itself against the Bible. - Søren Kierkegaard

AT THE FEET OF THE MASTER

James Lileks on That Book:

But on Saturday I read: sat outside in the gazebo and hammered my way through “The Da Vinci Code.” If “Angels and Demons” was a Tom Clancy novel for Art History majors, “Code” is “24” for pagans, I suppose. The writing, as others have noted, is bad – not unbearably so, but reading the book is like being borne along by a rushing stream of flat ginger ale. You’re certainly going somewhere, but the medium of your conveyance lacks distinction. Some moments were laughable – I could not imagine the character “Teabing” as anything other than “Teabag,” and almost imagined a bottom-heavy wet man with a string tied to his head. I did put the book down, laughing, when the author suggested that Walt Disney was in on the conspiracy to bring forth the truth about the Goddess. Why? Because of “The Little Mermaid,” which was just full of Piscean symbolism. Because the ancients, you know, revered fish, or crabs, or water, or something or other.

Those ancients: they revered everything. They worshipped the circle! Also the square. And, according to a 10th century French monk, the rectangle had certain mystical connotations as well, and that’s why our beds are rectangular. Up until the Council of Sealy, convened by King Quoil, everyone slept in circular beds like the ancient Zoroastrans, beds from which no one ever fell. But rectangular beds were easier to fall out of, so the Council mandated such shapes so people would be reminded of the Fall of Man, preferably on a nightly basis. And so forth. On and on. The wisdom of the ancients. They believed the moon was the Breast of the Goddess of Night! All well and good, So-crates, but we’ve been there, and it’s a rock covered in dust.

Blasphemer! You – no, sorry, only the evil horrible CHURCH accuses people of blasphemy, we pagans are a come-one-come-all sort of people, accepting of all beliefs. Except for Christians, who go straight to the Coliseum for lion appetizers. Anyway, the moon has mystical goddess powers! It affects the tide and the cycle of a woman’s womb!

Well, gravity will do that. All due respect, you guys didn’t have the whole story back when you were assembling cosmologies based primarily on observation. I mean, you made a nice start, but you were also poking through bird guts to see if the augurs were good. Nowadays we’ve come to believe that half-digested seeds are an insufficient means for predicting likely outcomes. The financial industry hasn’t used them for decades.

But we believed in the Goddess, and you, the patriarchal Western evil sex-denying female-fearing popish testosterone-intoxicated tool user has utterly removed the Holy Female from your spiritual realm!

Right. Exactly. Women, all gone. No sacred dames. Aside from that Mary, Mother of, but she’s just a footnote, and you hardly hear anything about her. You’re quite right; Western civilization is bound up in a cinched surplice of denial and prudery, and we spend our days in fear of the Holy Sexual Whatever. I – hold on, the TiVo just bonged – whoa! "G-string Divas" marathon on HBO tonight! Alright. Anyway, you’re quite correct; we do have a certain veneer of “civilization” draped around sex, inasmuch as the Twins do not open with the pitcher rutting with a consort on the mound. Which I’m sure is named after some part of Venus’ anatomy, and if only we knew it, we would be amazed at how some of our words and terms were derived from ancient cultures, man! Did you know George Washingon was a Mason and a hemp farmer? They’ll never let you know that. How do I know? I read it in a book in the library. Anyway, pass the bong.

You are missing the point! At this very moment, self-mortifying Opus Dei monks are plotting to suppress the old and ancient ways!

And more power to ’em. A bloody albino shows up at my door tomorrow, I’ll put him up, with gratitude. The alternative worldview postulated in “The Da Vinci Code” does not exactly give us anything transcendent and wonderful, friend; the most “sacred ritual” described consists of some old French grandfather, nagoy and panhandled, moaning under some grindy-hipped fleshy woman “with long silver hair,” while observers – yes, observers! – stand around in masks holding orbs, chanting. I met her in the grotto and she sheathed my sword, da doo ron ron, da doo ron ron. This may be why the interminable Latin mass became popular: absolutely zero chance of seeing Granny get it on in front of the bridge club.

UPDATE: The Captain was also unimpressed.

Posted on 5/30/2006 11:02:33 PM , 17 comments

Submitted by Daniel Muller at 5/31/2006 12:14:59 AM

Today my Episcopalian coworker told me over the telephone that she had seen That Movie yesterday. [Pause for eye roll and simultaneous slow inhalation.] She said that it had some slams against the Roman Catholic Church. [Second pause for second eye roll.] She said that she did not know what difference it would make if it were all true about Jesus [burst of incredulous laughter and reference to the authority of the Church], but she did want to know about "those monks." I told her that we had plenty in town, and she could visit the non-albino ["You did see the movie!" she exclaimed.] monastery at the Catholic university where she had gotten her M.B.A.; she seemed surprised to hear about it. I also told her to remember that everything in the movie was fabricated. She ended by saying, "Well, I am Episcopalian. We believe everything!"
Submitted by J. Scott at 5/31/2006 12:36:26 AM

Lileks has ruined Mass for me now. I'll never be able to exorcise that image!
Submitted by Katherine at 5/31/2006 12:44:54 AM

Gracious! But he does make the thesis of "da Vinci" sound as ridiculous as it really is.
Submitted by Creighton at 5/31/2006 6:41:13 AM

She ended by saying, "Well, I am Episcopalian. We believe everything!" Well, that explains everything! God have mercy.
Submitted by Timothy Fountain at 5/31/2006 7:38:05 AM

Needs a disclaimer! "Warning: do not read while consuming breakfast cereal. Author is not responsible for milk spewed over laptop due to abrupt laughter." What a great piece. Will DVC inspire an exciting new episode for the Anglican Investigator? Maybe a rumor that some Episcopal clergy were actually straight before the denomination suppressed the practice.
Submitted by Allen Lewis at 5/31/2006 10:39:21 AM

Pricking the pretentious - that's Lileks!
Submitted by Allen Lewis at 5/31/2006 10:44:38 AM

Ya know, other authors have written about "conspiracies" amongst different segments of the Church - Robert Ludlum comes to mind. But those books have worked, mainly because the writing was better and the plot line was much more solid.

One of the nice things about the reviews I have read is that I will not have to waste my time reading a book that is not even well written!

Thanks for posting this, Chris. You have saved me a world of time!!
Submitted by Philip G at 5/31/2006 11:30:11 AM

I loved the word image, ".... reading the book is like being borne along by a rushing stream of flat ginger ale. You’re certainly going somewhere, but the medium of your conveyance lacks distinction...."

What a wonderful description of the bland, yet tasteless, dreck that the DVC trumpets.

Chris, I also echo a call for another episode of the Anglican Investigator. Puhleeeeaaassseee.

Submitted by Christopher Johnson at 5/31/2006 12:32:11 PM

Philip G,

Hmmmm...

Submitted by Peter at 5/31/2006 1:18:19 PM

Forget another episode. I want to see the novel come out. Might ever buy it ;-)
Submitted by Peter at 5/31/2006 1:20:23 PM

'even buy it'

Blinkin' typing

Submitted by Southern Methodist at 5/31/2006 6:06:39 PM

I would encourage everyone to read this book. It is no laughing matter. A certain amount of people will read it and believe a lot that it says. Worst of which is not that Christ fathered children or the slurs against the Catholic Church. It's not good to turn your back on an adversary.
Submitted by The Pilgrim at 5/31/2006 7:06:23 PM

Oh my. thirteen responses to this topic, and thirteen to the topic below it. Didn't The Ancients worship the number 13, or fear it, or something?
Submitted by Bill (not IB) at 5/31/2006 8:35:56 PM

For Alfonso et al,

Shame, shame on Mr. Lileks for assuming that everyone who reads his comments is conversant in the language of "A Clockwork Orange". I refer, of course, to his use of "nagoy and panhandled", which came straight from the pages of Burgess' novel. Alfonso is right about "nagoy". "Pan-handled" is a euphemism used for a male in a state of sexual arousal.

By the way - I've loved using the material that Anthony Burgess included in "Clockwork Orange" as insults over the years; calling someone a "grahzny bratchny" ("dirty ba**ard") is very eloquent on one hand, and leaves them scratching their heads over whether or not they've been insulted. But in general it's best to use terminology that everyone can understand.
Submitted by alfonso at 6/1/2006 10:23:08 AM

Oh, thanks, re panhandle..., I thought Lileks meant he was begging in some letcherous manner. Nagoy didn't get many hits on google; I finally found it in an online slang dictionary. I've never read Clockwork Orange, although I sometimes fancy myself as a "student of popular culture"...but obviously not a master. I don't mind when terminology is used that I don't understand, but if you can't even find it on "dictionary.com", I agree it's probably too obscure.
Submitted by Bill (not IB) at 6/1/2006 4:14:41 PM

Alfonso,

It's far too easy for folks to think that others "get the citation". I'm glad that I was able to provide context for this instance, but I truly would like to have people send comments whenever they don't understand things - it's the only way folks who expect the whole world is universally read in every book ever printed will get the message that it's better to use adjectives than anecdotes. And this was a particularly ancient reference; I read "Clockwork Orange" freshman year in college back in 1975, over 30 years ago. (No comments about my age, people........)
Submitted by Michael D. Harmon at 6/4/2006 4:02:28 PM

Horrowshow, Bill, horrorshow!
Name: Url:
Confirm: